How to Marry Phenomenology and Pragmatism. Scheler’s proposal
نویسنده
چکیده
A common view of early twentieth century philosophy correctly distinguishes three movements or tendencies, phenomenology, pragmatism and the beginnings of analytic philosophy, and claims that early phenomenology and pragmatism are two radically opposed philosophical positions. Early phenomenology, it is said, is in the tradition of the logical objectivisms of Bolzano and Frege. It is only with the writings of Heidegger that phenomenology and pragmatism begin to be on speaking terms.
منابع مشابه
European Journal of Pragmatism and American Philosophy
This article introduces a new pragmatist-inspired perspective on the social sciences. It explores the relevance of neo-pragmatism for the philosophy of the social sciences, showing how it can lead to innovative and groundbreaking social research. The paper attempts to drive home these insights by elaborating on the affinities of neopragmatism with some Continental philosophers who have engaged ...
متن کاملDevelopment and Usability Evaluation of an Online Tutorial for “How to Write a Proposal” for Medical Sciences Students
Background and Objective: Considering the importance of learning how to write a proposal for students, this study was performed to develop an online tutorial for “How to write a Proposal” for students and to evaluate its usability. Methods: This study is a developmental research and tool design. “Gamified Online Tutorial based on Self-Determination Theory (GOT-STD) Framework" became the basis f...
متن کاملMigration and social differentiation
business," Sun remembered. "Shortly after the meeting, the old lady asked for a marriage proposal with her daughter through a match maker." On hearing that, Sun was a little shocked since he thought, "I could not marry her daughter because her family was rich. I was too poor to afford the brideprice." The daughter was also kind of reluctant to marry him because she said, "If I married him, I wo...
متن کاملHow to, and how not to, bridge computational cognitive neuroscience and Husserlian phenomenology of time consciousness
Anumber of recent attempts to bridgeHusserlian phenomenology of time consciousness and contemporary tools and results from cognitive science or computational neuroscience are described and critiqued. An alternate proposal is outlined that lacks the weaknesses of existing accounts.
متن کاملConsciousness operationalized, a debate realigned.
This paper revisits the debate about cognitive phenomenology. It elaborates, defends, and improves on our earlier proposal for resolving that debate, according to which the test for irreducible phenomenology is the presence of explanatory gaps. After showing how proposals like ours have been misunderstood or misused by others, we deploy our operationalization to argue that the correct way to al...
متن کامل